11日，話題“AI照片竟然拿了攝影比賽第一名”沖上熱搜第一。

An AI-generated image has been stripped of first prize in a photography contest organized by a high-end hotel brand after netizens identified clear signs of artificial intelligence manipulation, reigniting debate over AI's role in creative competitions.

近日，有網(wǎng)友發(fā)帖稱，華住高端酒店品牌舉辦的攝影大賽，獲得第一名的作品，拉曝光再放大看竟然是一張AI圖！該攝影大賽還請(qǐng)了5位專業(yè)評(píng)委給作品打分，評(píng)委中還不乏一些協(xié)會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng)等大咖。

Online posts alleged that the winning entry in a photography contest held by H World Group was not a genuine photograph but an AI-generated image.

第42號(hào)作品《騎樓舊光》

根據(jù)該網(wǎng)友所說(shuō)，記者找到該比賽第42號(hào)作品《騎樓舊光》原圖，將亮度調(diào)大并將曝光調(diào)到過(guò)量曝光，明顯看到圖片右側(cè)的數(shù)個(gè)牌匾出現(xiàn)字體錯(cuò)亂和字體生成不全。

該網(wǎng)友稱，這是Al生成圖片的常見錯(cuò)誤，一眼就可辨別圖片是AI生成的。還有其他例如老人提鳥籠的手指跟手掌連不起來(lái)、左側(cè)連續(xù)兩個(gè)涼茶鋪牌匾之類的露餡細(xì)節(jié)。

The disputed work, Entry No 42, was initially awarded first place in the contest, which was judged by five professionals from national and municipal photography and fine arts associations.

According to a netizen who examined the image, adjusting brightness and exposure revealed typical AI flaws, including distorted characters on shop signs, unnatural finger details, and duplicated storefronts.

調(diào)高曝光后的《騎樓時(shí)光》

另?yè)?jù)帖子信息，記者搜索到這項(xiàng)名為“藝術(shù)MaxX·城市記憶攝影大賽”的比賽，在華住會(huì)旗下上海東方美侖美奐酒店和華住美好家族官方公眾號(hào)均有宣傳。

此前第一名結(jié)果公示

記者查看獲獎(jiǎng)公示信息發(fā)現(xiàn)，該作品位于綜合獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)第一名，第二名為作品《陸家嘴》，攝影比賽評(píng)委由“中國(guó)攝影家協(xié)會(huì)會(huì)員”“上海市美術(shù)家協(xié)會(huì)會(huì)員”等專業(yè)評(píng)委共5人組成。

據(jù)了解，該賽事公示日期為1月6日至1月10日23時(shí)59分，公示文件現(xiàn)已被刪除。1月10日，上海外灘東方美侖美奐等多家酒店公眾號(hào)公布了最終比賽結(jié)果，稱比賽公示期已結(jié)束。

值得注意的是，最終獲獎(jiǎng)名單中，此前公示文件中的第二名已變更為第一名。

The work was listed as first place during the public notice period from Tuesday to Saturday, which has since been removed. When the final results were released on Saturday, the former second-place entry was promoted to first place.

11日下午，封面新聞?dòng)浾咧码娙A住會(huì)客服，了解取消原因及后續(xù)處理情況�？头貞�(yīng)稱：“經(jīng)過(guò)內(nèi)部多方核查，作品不符合原創(chuàng)性規(guī)則，經(jīng)和投稿人溝通后取消了成績(jī)。最終結(jié)果以公示為準(zhǔn)。”

A H World customer service representative told reporters on Sunday that the award was revoked after internal reviews found the work violated originality requirements, adding that the decision followed communication with the submitter.

去年底，福建省旅游發(fā)展集團(tuán)主辦的攝影大賽一等獎(jiǎng)作品《湖秋霧影》被網(wǎng)友質(zhì)疑為AI生成，同樣引發(fā)熱議。

有AIGC專業(yè)人士分析，該圖片中樹葉的紋理和顏色過(guò)渡均勻，未能體現(xiàn)出真實(shí)照片中因光照、視角等因素導(dǎo)致的細(xì)微差異，整體細(xì)節(jié)呈現(xiàn)出一種“過(guò)度平滑”的質(zhì)感。這些特征表明，此圖片極有可能是由AI生成的。

A similar controversy emerged late last year when a first-prize entry in a Fujian Tourism Development Group photography contest, was also suspected of being AI-generated. Experts note that such images often exhibit overly smooth textures and uniform color transitions, unlike real photographs.

北京市隆安律師事務(wù)所高級(jí)合伙人李長(zhǎng)青曾表示，賽事規(guī)則明確禁止AI作品參賽，參賽者報(bào)名即視為同意該條款，其提交AI生成作品的行為構(gòu)成違約。主辦方有權(quán)取消其一等獎(jiǎng)資格；若賽事規(guī)則中已明確規(guī)定承擔(dān)相應(yīng)賠償責(zé)任，主辦方還可向參賽者追償。

Legal expert Li Changqing warn that submitting AI-generated works to contests that explicitly prohibit them may constitute a breach of contract, allowing organizers to revoke awards and seek compensation if stipulated in the rules.

stipulate /?st?pjule?t/ 規(guī)定

有媒體評(píng)論稱，沒(méi)有規(guī)矩不成方圓。對(duì)于AI技術(shù)的運(yùn)用，相關(guān)行業(yè)或者各類比賽應(yīng)及時(shí)建立規(guī)則，明確“AI輔助”與“AI生成”的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與適用界限，與此同時(shí)，創(chuàng)作者也應(yīng)對(duì)AI使用情況進(jìn)行說(shuō)明，明確的邊界以及清晰透明的規(guī)則，才是避免爭(zhēng)議的關(guān)鍵。

Commentators say the incident highlights the need for clearer standards distinguishing AI-assisted from AI-generated works, as well as greater transparency and disclosure requirements, to prevent similar disputes in the future.

對(duì)此，你怎么看？

來(lái)源：中國(guó)青年報(bào) 封面新聞 上游新聞 中國(guó)新聞周刊 法治日?qǐng)?bào)

跟著China Daily

精讀英語(yǔ)新聞

“無(wú)痛”學(xué)英語(yǔ)，每天20分鐘就夠！