本周JCS 外刊吃瓜

將繼續(xù)為大家推送

社會學國際頂刊

Gender & Society

的最新目錄及其摘要

ABOUT G&S

【期刊簡介】

1

Gender & Society

Gender & Society, the official journal of Sociologists for Women in Society, is a top-ranked journal in sociology and women's studies and publishes fewer than five percent of all papers submitted to it. Articles in Gender & Society analyze gender and gendered processes in interactions, organizations, societies, and global and transnational spaces. The journal primarily publishes empirical articles, which are both theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous, including both qualitative and quantitative methods. The journal also occasionally publishes theoretical articles that meaningfully advance sociological theories about gender.

Some of the relevant, timely, and important topics covered in recent issues include:

• Activism and Social Movements

• Class Inequality

• Division of Household Labor

• Feminist Identity

• Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies

• Gender and Migration

• Gender and Work

• Gendered Bodies

• Health and Carework

• Heteronormativity

• Intimate Partner Violence

• Masculinities

• Media Representations

• Parenting

• Politics and Gender

• Race, Gender, and Class Discrimination

• Reproductive Technology

• Religion and Gender

• Sexual Harassment

• Sexualities

• Welfare Reform

Key Indexs:

• First decision：平均27天給出初審意見。該數(shù)據(jù)體現(xiàn)期刊處理來稿的效率。

• Acceptance to publication：稿件錄用后，平均30天可發(fā)表。該數(shù)據(jù)關(guān)乎成果發(fā)布速度。

• Acceptance rate：投稿中約11.9%能被錄用。這是衡量期刊競爭程度和選擇性的核心指標。

• Impact factor：影響因子為3.4 。該指標由 Clarivate Analytics基于 Web of Science 數(shù)據(jù)庫計算，計算方式為某期刊前兩年發(fā)表論文在統(tǒng)計年被引用總次數(shù)除以該期刊前兩年發(fā)表論文總數(shù)。IF是國際上常用評判期刊學術(shù)水平的指標之一 ，體現(xiàn)期刊近期論文被引用的頻率和學術(shù)影響力。

Current Issue

Gender & Society 為雙月刊，最新一期（Volume 39 Issue 4, August 2025）包括“Articles”“Book Reviews”兩個部分，共計14篇文章，詳情如下。

CONTENTS

【原版目錄】

2

3

本期內(nèi)容

原文摘要

GENDER & SOCIETY

Volume 39 Issue 4, August 2025

Articles

Gender found Guilty: Anti-Gender Backlash and (Dis)Translation Politics in Iraq

Balsam Mustafa

The Iraqi Federal Supreme Court banned the term gender in February 2024, resulting in a crackdown on gender equity and significantly undermining the space for feminist activism and advocacy. This article examines the conditions leading to the 2023 anti-gender backlash in Iraq, the discursive strategies of the backlashers, and its broader implications for feminist activism. The backlash was rooted in ongoing sociopolitical repression following the 2019 Tishreen (October) protests and a climate of widespread disinformation. It gained traction by weaponizing concepts of gender and homophobia. Opponents framed the term gender as a Western plot aimed at undermining Islamic values and societal norms. They exploited the problematic relationship between gender and translation, using deliberate misinterpretations to construct a narrative that demonizes gender and those who support gendered understandings of social relationships. Analyzing the backlashers’ discourse and incorporating local feminist voices, this study highlights the backlash on gendered activism, academic inquiry, and women’s rights. The article concludes by discussing the intertwined nature of discursive and material violence, emphasizing the erosion of human rights in post-2003 Iraq and contributing to the broader literature on gendered activism in the Middle East and globally.

“I Actually Snapped”: Conceptualizing Resistance to Street Harassment as Feminist Snap and Erosion

Bianca Fileborn

In this article, I examine the strategies of resistance deployed by people who have experienced street harassment. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 47 heterosexual women and LGBTQ+ people, I document how participants skillfully and contextually deployed resistance strategies to disrupt harassment. Notably, participants often represented resistance practices as moments of affective, subconscious snap. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s concept of feminist snap as well as feminist scholarship on affect and embodiment, I argue that practices of resistance must be located within a much longer history of harassment which builds up or sediments in the body over time, culminating in an affective breaking point. As Ahmed suggests, “a snap is not the starting point.” Conversely, other participants described being worn down by harassment over time, which I conceptualize as a form of feminist erosion. In examining practices of resistance to street harassment, I aim to provide insight into the disruption and contestation of dominant power relations and the formation of embodied, gendered subjectivities.

Cognitive Labor, Power, and Patriarchal Bargains: Not-so-Invisible Barriers to Gendered Change

Abigail Ocobock

Cognitive labor is an obdurate source of inequality between partners, and is usually considered so because the nature of the work makes it “invisible” to those involved. Yet given that talk of the “mental load” is now widespread and the pandemic amplified awareness of disparities, gender scholars have reason to question its “invisibility.” I ask: Are partners in heterosexual relationships aware of gendered inequalities in cognitive labor? How do partners legitimate inequalities in cognitive labor, given increased awareness? What prevents partners from achieving gendered change in cognitive labor? To answer these, I draw on interview data collected during the pandemic from 81 heterosexually partnered parents in the United States. I find that cognitive labor is far from invisible to women performing it and appears invisible to men only because they use resistance strategies to avoid it. I argue that the “invisibility” of cognitive labor stems from gendered power dynamics—both interpersonal and structural—not from the nature of the work process itself. I expand understanding of the power dynamics that sustain inequalities in this domain, pushing beyond typical explanations that center hidden power. Instead, I emphasize the role of patriarchal bargains in a seemingly intractable gender structure that gives men power.

Perceived Fairness of Couples’ Division of Housework: Evidence From a Multi-Factorial Experiment in the United States

Daniela R. Urbina, Daria Tisch

Although the ratio of women’s to men’s housework hours has declined, women still spend more time than men doing household tasks in most high-income contexts. This article examines one of the hypothesized mechanisms underlying the persistence of housework disparities—fairness perceptions—via a survey experiment in the United States. We ask: What factors contribute to fairness assessments of unequal divisions of housework in different-sex couples? Given increasing trends in gender-egalitarian attitudes, do people still think it is more fair for women to do a larger share of the housework? To address these questions, we relied on a multi-factorial vignette experiment on a nationally representative sample of 1,502 adults, in which respondents rated the fairness of the divisions of housework among hypothetical couples. Our results demonstrate that respondents engage in trade-off calculations that, to some extent, justify unequal divisions of housework. Spouses’ relative earnings and work time were assessed as contributions that justify doing fewer housework chores for both men and women. Contrary to our expectations, we find that people perceive arrangements where women perform a higher proportion of housework as less fair than scenarios where men do so. These results suggest a shift in public opinion regarding prescriptive gendered norms about housework divisions, contrasting with the decreasing but persistent gender gap in housework disadvantaging women.

Respectability and Responsibility: HBCU Women’s Gender Strategies for Heterosexuality

Mercedez Dunn-Gallier

Collegiate environments are racialized and classed locations accompanied by both cultural rules for sex and romance and institutional support that make idealized experiences viable. While historically Black colleges/universities (HBCUs) endorse a racialized contract for heterosexual monogamy that upholds broader institutional commitments to respectable middle-class Black gender, these environments often cannot reliably support the sexual arrangements they compel. Using interviews with 30 cisgender heterosexual Black undergraduate women at an HBCU, I identified three gender strategies they used to navigate their romantic and sexual lives within these conditions. This research contributes to scholarship on gender strategies as interactional processes that are informed by race and class. Moreover, I demonstrate how institutional contexts facilitate or inhibit idealized sexual experiences for the accomplishment of heteronormative gender. As cishet HBCU women attempted to resolve cultural and structural constraints on their heterosexual lives within and beyond their campus, the dilemmas they faced revealed how racial, class, and gender structures make negotiations of heterosexual interaction particularly perplexing for middle-class aspirant Black women and the limitations of respectable middle-class Black womanhood to mitigate social and sexual vulnerabilities.

Book Reviews

Book Review: Gendered Labour, Everyday Security and Migration: An Examination of Domestic Work and Domestic Workers’ Experiences in Singapore and Hong Kong by Shih Joo Tan

Yuying Tong

Book Review: From South Central to Southside: Gang Transnationalism, Masculinity, and Disorganized Violence in Belize City by Adam Baird

Jade Levell

Book Review: When Care Is Conditional: Immigrants and the U.S. Safety Net by Dani Carrillo

Kristina M. Fullerton Rico

Book Review: Sex in Canada: The Who, Why, When, and How of Getting Down Up North by Tina FetnerEllen Lamont

Ellen Lamont

Book Review: Violent Intimacies: The Trans Everyday and the Making of an Urban World by Asli Zengin

Kris Rosentel

Book Review: Empowering Housewives in Southeast Turkey: Gender, State and Development by Kübra Zeynep Sar?aslan

Fatma müge G??ek

Book Review: Webbed Connectivities: The Imperial Sociology of Sex, Gender, and Sexuality by Vrushali Patil

Mabrouka M’barek

Book Review: Proper Women: Feminism and the Politics of Respectability in Iran by Fae Chubin

Norma Claire Moruzzi

Book Review: The End of Peacekeeping: Gender, Race, and the Martial Politics of Intervention by Marsha Henry

Laura Mcleod

以上就是本期 JCS Focus 的全部內(nèi)容啦！

期刊/趣文/熱點/漫談

學術(shù)路上，

JCS 陪你一起成長！

關(guān)于JCS

《中國社會學學刊》（The Journal of Chinese Sociology）于2014年10月由中國社會科學院社會學研究所創(chuàng)辦。作為中國大陸第一本英文社會學學術(shù)期刊，JCS致力于為中國社會學者與國外同行的學術(shù)交流和合作打造國際一流的學術(shù)平臺。JCS由全球最大科技期刊出版集團施普林格·自然(Springer Nature)出版發(fā)行，由國內(nèi)外頂尖社會學家組成強大編委會隊伍，采用雙向匿名評審方式和“開放獲取”(open access)出版模式。JCS已于2021年5月被ESCI收錄。2022年，JCS的CiteScore分值為2.0（Q2），在社科類別的262種期刊中排名第94位，位列同類期刊前36%。2025年JCS最新影響因子1.3，位列社會學領(lǐng)域期刊全球前53%（Q3）。

▉ 歡迎向《中國社會學學刊》投稿!!

Please consider submitting to

The Journal of Chinese Sociology!

▉ 官方網(wǎng)站：

https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com